1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Saturday 22 May 2004 02:02 pm, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
5 |
> On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 11:37:46AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote: |
6 |
> > Once we all read the developer's proposal, we could do a simple 2/3 |
7 |
> > supermajority vote or something similar. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I would suggest tiering it. Something like the following: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> $0 - 500, 50% majority |
12 |
> $501 - $2500, 66% majority |
13 |
> $2501+, 80% majority |
14 |
|
15 |
I think these are all great ideas. John's idea of proposal requirements is |
16 |
very good. Then these proposals could be kept along with the public ledger |
17 |
so that everything is out in the open, and there is never a question of "what |
18 |
did the trustees do with that last $1,000 dollars?) |
19 |
|
20 |
I guess a better question would be to take a step back.. how are we going to |
21 |
make money? Currently, as far as I am aware we are at $0.00, not even enough |
22 |
to fulfill the CVS ram request. |
23 |
|
24 |
We have gotten a recent offer of help from Paul Nowack of the NAAEE (.org) |
25 |
when we get ready to write grant proposals. He has a lot of experience in |
26 |
that field, and has a great desire to help push Gentoo in the academia and |
27 |
government areas. I had a video conference with him a couple of months ago |
28 |
on an unrelated issue, he seemed to be a very well driven man. We also have |
29 |
a few people here at IU who are good at grant writing (many NFS and IBM sur |
30 |
grants). However, grants are only one avenue. I just had to throw that in |
31 |
there as an FYI for the rest of the trustees. |
32 |
|
33 |
Cheers! |
34 |
|
35 |
- -Corey |
36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
37 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
38 |
|
39 |
iD8DBQFAr8GApq/4o6MEFFMRAjEOAJ96/vYBBj97zpWBlxRYNl4Q/d/xGgCeKx1W |
40 |
tAwbPQdGT3alkEUy95EggRQ= |
41 |
=91zQ |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |