1 |
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 06:09, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
> All -- |
3 |
> |
4 |
> We haven't yet discussed how we're going to spend money (or decide how to |
5 |
> spend money) but below is a message from Robin that I think clearly |
6 |
> justifies spending some money on lark. It might be a good catalyst to get |
7 |
> us to figure out what our budgeting and expenditure approval process is |
8 |
> going to be. It can be as simple as someone (like me) posting an email |
9 |
> (like this) to this list or it can be somethimg more complex. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Ideas? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> --kurt |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
Kurt (and others)- |
17 |
I don't think that we need to go more complex. Robin wrote a well |
18 |
written factually based argument as to why we need more RAM in lark. I |
19 |
believe this document gives us enough background to make an informed |
20 |
decision and vote. |
21 |
|
22 |
We could make our official policy this (flame and lacerate please ;): |
23 |
|
24 |
Gentoo developers seeking funds from the Gentoo Foundation should |
25 |
contact the Gentoo Foundation treasurer and provide them with a well |
26 |
written statement describing the amount and nature of funds required as |
27 |
well as answering the following questions: |
28 |
|
29 |
1. Why are the funds needed? |
30 |
2. How will the funds benefit the Gentoo community? |
31 |
3. How will the funds benfit the Gentoo development community? |
32 |
|
33 |
The last question I am shaky on ... I would like three points though for |
34 |
structure - ideas? |
35 |
|
36 |
Once we all read the developer's proposal, we could do a simple 2/3 |
37 |
supermajority vote or something similar. |
38 |
|
39 |
Cheers, |
40 |
-- |
41 |
John Davis |
42 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
43 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen> |
44 |
|
45 |
---- |
46 |
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc> |
47 |
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338 FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47 |