| 1 |
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 21:21, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2) Progress on getting the "g" logo registered isn't going as well. The |
| 3 |
> UST&PO wants a black and white, non-dithered version of the logo, which |
| 4 |
> of course doesn't exist, and if it did exist would not look like our |
| 5 |
> friendly "g" logo anyway (so I'm not sure how valuable the registered |
| 6 |
> trademark would be even if we got it.) The UST&PO will only register |
| 7 |
> trademarks that can be represented in black and white without shading, |
| 8 |
> and the "g" logo is clearly not in this category. My lawyers are happy |
| 9 |
> to keep trying to get it registered (and charging me/us several |
| 10 |
> thousand dollars for their time) but this doesn't seem like a smart |
| 11 |
> course of action. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Is there any idea on what the registration of a "black and white" tradmark |
| 14 |
would cost additionally? The reason I ask is that while our actual logo |
| 15 |
isn't black and white, the comparison with potential infringements will |
| 16 |
also be based on the black and white picture. There certainly is |
| 17 |
potential to create a similar logo without infringing on the copyright. |
| 18 |
In such a case trademark law can be very helpfull as it protects against |
| 19 |
usage of "similar" words/images as trademark, while copyright only |
| 20 |
protects against the use of the "actual" images we use. A black and white |
| 21 |
Outline should be enough for trademark purposes as the point is to |
| 22 |
protect against similarity, not "being the same". As an advantage the |
| 23 |
black-and-white version would allow us to do recoloring restyling of the |
| 24 |
logo while still having it protected. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> What I plan to do: stop trying to register the "g" logo and just follow |
| 27 |
> through and get the "gentoo" name registered. This also seems to make |
| 28 |
> sense seeing that the Gentoo Web site redesign is underway and it looks |
| 29 |
> like we will be getting a new logo for Gentoo anyway. We can still use |
| 30 |
> copyright to protect misuse of the "g" logo, and still use it as a |
| 31 |
> trademark, just not a registered one. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Is there any way you can get legal advantage of a non-registered trademark |
| 34 |
opposed to no trademark at all? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Greetings, |
| 37 |
Paul |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 41 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 42 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 43 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives