| 1 |
Daniel, mind sending thos "agreement" to the list, (in a format I can read?) I would like to see the agreement again, but I don't see it in my folder. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:38:53 -0600 |
| 7 |
> From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 8 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
| 9 |
> To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
| 10 |
> Subject: RE: [gentoo-trustees] Legal advice |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Hi Kurt, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > Could you also clarify exactly what you would expect to |
| 15 |
> > "tweak" if we did decide that seeking a c3 status was in the |
| 16 |
> > best interest of the Gentoo community? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Maybe I wouldn't "tweak" anything. Maybe I have nothing particular in mind. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Here's the point: if you want to make unilateral changes to our agreement, |
| 21 |
> then you should also allow me that ability. Or, in the interest of abiding |
| 22 |
> by our existing agreement, choose to make no changes at all and we can |
| 23 |
> proceed as planned. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Like I said, I'm *am* open to considering the possibility of changes being |
| 26 |
> made to the agreement. My question to you is this -- will you afford me the |
| 27 |
> same opportunity? Or is this a one way street? If you expect me to abide by |
| 28 |
> all my obligations while selectively abiding by yours, I'd like to suggest |
| 29 |
> that this isn't particularly fair. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Regards, |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Daniel |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> -- |
| 38 |
> gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
| 44 |
dmwaters@g.o |
| 45 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives