Gentoo Archives: gentoo-trustees

From: Daniel Ostrow <dostrow@g.o>
To: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright, take 3
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20:58:12
Message-Id: 1131224468.15663.5.camel@Celes64.anyarch.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright, take 3 by Grant Goodyear
1 On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 14:51 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
2 > Deedra Waters wrote: [Sat Nov 05 2005, 12:22:10PM CST]
3 > > The next step i believe is to present it to the devs. Does anyone have
4 > > any problems with my going ahead with this to keep things moving?
5 >
6 > I'm certainly all for pushing it out to our devs.
7
8 I agree, we've all said all we have to say. Now it has to be up to the
9 community to accept, reject or modify it. I believe we have come up with
10 the best solution we can, the only thing that is going to be difficult
11 is convincing the community of the need for it (that and the fact that
12 the document lacks any sinister nature).
13
14 Is there any way that we can get it posted to -core coming from the
15 trustees@ address...I think it would be far better if it was clear that
16 the document was coming from the trustees as a whole and not just one
17 individual.
18
19 --Dan
20
21 --
22 gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright, take 3 Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright, take 3 Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>