(I see no problems with this..)   my $0.02

Daniel Robbins wrote:

>Hi Deedra,
>
>That would be fine. I just want "drobbins@g.o" to get to me; I
>don't need Gentoo to provide me with a mail account, just a permanent
>alias.
>
>Regards,
>
>Daniel
>
>On Apr 12, 2005 3:17 PM, Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o> wrote:
>  
>
>>What if we just have an alias that forwards the mail so he does get the
>>mail, but it's his responsibility to filter the mail through gmail, or
>>what ever he uses on his end, along with what Paul suggested. My main
>>thing here is that a while back he was using dev.g.o for specificly
>>"managing his mail" or something to that effect. infra disabled his
>>account, and that caused a lot of problems. Paul brings up a vallid
>>point with the articles etc etc.
>>
>>On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:29:50 +0200
>>>From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
>>>Reply-To: gentoo-trustees@g.o
>>>To: gentoo-trustees@g.o
>>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright transfer agreement
>>>
>>>On Tuesday 12 April 2005 22:20, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT]
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my
>>>>>intention...
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o,
>>>>>I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the
>>>>>store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it.
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>I think there may be two different aspects of this issue.  One is
>>>>drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which
>>>>implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo.  Given that we
>>>>control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe
>>>>that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I
>>>>understand that some will disagree with me on principle.  The other
>>>>issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o.  That
>>>>e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his
>>>>Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I
>>>>can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that
>>>>address.  Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming
>>>>that one is needed)?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>What about an abuse termination clause, that states that if he uses the
>>>address to act as a gentoo developer/against the interests of the foundation
>>>while in fact not being a member (he might rejoin) his right to use the email
>>>address is lost (possibly after X warnings)
>>>
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>--
>>Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
>>dmwaters@g.o
>>Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org
>>
>>--
>>gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>--
>gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Corey Shields
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields

--
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list