1 |
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 14:58 -0700, Deedra Waters wrote: |
2 |
> 1. We only worry about copyrighting code that gentoo actually owns, |
3 |
> mainly catalyst, portage, the installer and things like that. |
4 |
> Also any documentation that gentoo has written along with the utilities |
5 |
> that may have been written for portage etc etc. |
6 |
|
7 |
That makes sense to me, since the vast majority of ebuilds aren't really |
8 |
copyrightable anyway. |
9 |
|
10 |
> 2. it would be a co-ownership basically, meaning thatif i wrote |
11 |
> documentation or parts of documentation, i would retain the rights to |
12 |
> those docs, but gentoo owns the entire thing. |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't understand this. Could you clarify? |
15 |
|
16 |
> 3. only gentoo would have the ability to sue. This is more a legal |
17 |
> thing, but basically it's so that if we ever had to go into law to |
18 |
> defend the copyright, the other person can't force us to drag all of |
19 |
> our developers into court. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm a little confused about what exactly you're proposing. Is it an |
22 |
exclusive license, assigning a share of the rights or something else |
23 |
altogether? |
24 |
|
25 |
Thanks, |
26 |
Donnie |