| 1 |
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:39:36 +0200 |
| 2 |
Lluís Lluís wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> hay alguna diferencia entre usar "nohup" o emplear screen? yo uso |
| 5 |
> screen para que el proceso siga aunque me desloguee de la máquina. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
nohup: Runs a command immune to hangups, |
| 8 |
with output to a non-terminal, so that the command can |
| 9 |
continue running in the background after you log out. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
nohup COMMAND [ARG]... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
screen: Creates a single window with a shell in it |
| 15 |
(or the specified command) on a given host machine. |
| 16 |
You may then detach and re-attach from the started shell |
| 17 |
(and the processes running within the shell). |
| 18 |
When you are detached the output that goes to the shell is |
| 19 |
stored in a buffer and you can look at it when you reattach. |
| 20 |
In this way you can "screen" a remote process. |
Archives