| 1 |
Todd Goodman wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> [110622 16:41]: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Matthew Finkel wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> [...] |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>> Do correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't blas-reference pulled in by |
| 9 |
>>> merging gcc with USE="fortran"? Or did you install blas-reference for |
| 10 |
>>> another reason? |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> No clue. I just -c'd some stuff and kept running revdep-rebuild and |
| 18 |
>> emerge -uvDNa world until it all got sorted. It took a few times but I |
| 19 |
>> finally got a clean result. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> The funny thing is this. I removed about 3 packages but had to install |
| 22 |
>> close to a dozen to satisfy what was missing. Cantore, or something |
| 23 |
>> like that, was left with no backend when I removed R. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> So, removed some bloat then installed some more bloat. Ain't that a peach? |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Dale |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> No actually blas-reference fails to build unless gcc is built with the |
| 32 |
> fortran use flag enabled (since there's no fortran compiler available.) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> The deps pulling in blas-reference are in my previous mail. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Todd |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Maybe we have something different then. I don't have blas-reference on |
| 41 |
here anymore either. My point was, disabling fortran to remove it only |
| 42 |
lead to other stuff being required. I think there is more on here now |
| 43 |
than there was before. So, removing fortran to get rid of bloat didn't |
| 44 |
help any because it just required a different set of bloat. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Dale |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
:-) :-) |
Archives