1 |
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Bruce Hill |
2 |
<daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 09:24:55PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
4 |
> <snip systemd fanboi text> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> And then months later has the nerve of calling my use of the word |
7 |
>> "fuck" (in which I wasn't insulting anyone) as "offensive": |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/261318 |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/261318 |
13 |
> |
14 |
>> I hope it doesn't offend anyone. That was not (nor is) the intention. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Regards. |
17 |
>> -- |
18 |
>> Canek Peláez Valdés |
19 |
> |
20 |
> So you weren't being honest when you wrote that in the first place. |
21 |
|
22 |
I already told you that I didn't wanted to offend anyone when I said |
23 |
"fuck", I used the word for emphasis. You keep failing to understand |
24 |
that, or you keep saying that I was dishonest as a diversion. |
25 |
|
26 |
And I will keep using the word that way; not to insult *personally* |
27 |
anyone. My point is that I find highly hypocrite that you took offense |
28 |
to a word written everyday in a lot of Linux mailing lists, when some |
29 |
months ago you used an homophobic rhetorical question directed |
30 |
*personally* against me, in a way that even an eight year old kid |
31 |
would understand it's offensive. Actually, except for you, in recent |
32 |
years I have only heard eight year old kids using the question "are |
33 |
you his boyfriend?" as an attack. |
34 |
|
35 |
In a technical mailing list, besides. |
36 |
|
37 |
So, keep trying to hide behind the false accusation that I was |
38 |
"dishonest" when I say that I didn't wanted to offend anyone; the |
39 |
undeniable truth is that you actually tried to offend me *personally*, |
40 |
like an eight year old, when you asked me if I was Lennart's |
41 |
boyfriend. |
42 |
|
43 |
In a technical mailing list. Recheck the March thread, if you must; or |
44 |
all the mailing list archives for what is worth. I try to stick with |
45 |
only technical arguments; sometimes I'm wrong, sometimes I have a |
46 |
different opinion than most on the list. But I stick to the technical |
47 |
arguments. And my "who the fuck cares?" mail was a call to stick to |
48 |
the technical arguments, BTW, not to some silly thing like who has the |
49 |
most seniority in the list. |
50 |
|
51 |
You, on the other hand in March, when you ran out of technical |
52 |
arguments (if saying "his coding is so questionable that "Lennartware" |
53 |
has become derogatory slang" can be called a "technical argument"), |
54 |
you resorted to ask me if I was Lennart's boyfriend. |
55 |
|
56 |
That's *your* level of discussion. Not mine. You are the one trying to |
57 |
offend. Not me. |
58 |
|
59 |
Regards. |
60 |
-- |
61 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
62 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
63 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |