Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David W Noon <dwnoon@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: i486
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:53:17
Message-Id: 20101123225302.7f32a9e3@karnak.local
1 On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:10:02 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
2 [gentoo-user] Re: i486:
3
4 >On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:36:49 +0000, David W Noon wrote:
5 >
6 >> >CFLAGS="-O2 -march=geode -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
7 >> >CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
8 >> >CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
9 >>
10 >> Try using i686 instead.
11 >>
12 >> >flags : fpu de pse tsc msr cx8 pge cmov mmx mmxext
13 >> >3dnowext
14 >>
15 >> You have CMOV and MMX, as well as 3DNow! instructions -- with
16 >> extensions. That makes it an Athlon "lite" processor, or a K6-3 with
17 >> CMOV instructions. These are enough to make it compatible with the
18 >> Pentium Pro (i686) architecture, and a bit more besides.
19 >
20 >Apparently it's not quite a full i686. The research I did at the time
21 >indicated that using anything higher than i486 was asking for problems.
22
23 I am a little surprised by that. I ran a couple of K6-3 boxes for some
24 few years using i586. As near as I could tell, those processors only
25 lacked CMOV instructions when compared with i686. I find it hard to
26 envisage the Geode lacking any i586 feature, given that it has MMX
27 instructions, CMOV instructions, the CMPXCHG8B instruction and a TSC
28 register -- all of those are way beyond i486.
29 --
30 Regards,
31
32 Dave [RLU #314465]
33 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
34 dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon)
35 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: i486 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>