| 1 |
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100 Emanuele Rusconi <emarsk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > The point was that it could be changed. […] |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty |
| 10 |
> enough to drive people away. |
| 11 |
> The point was that when you feel that the distro you're using takes a |
| 12 |
> direction that doesn't fit you, you look for alternatives. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It is exactly what I intended to say from the beginning. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If the distro devs leave you no choice (at least in arranging its working |
| 17 |
iterface) and starting to say that they know better what you need, |
| 18 |
it is time to look for alternatives. |
Archives