| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Putting /usr on LVM is not the problem. I have had /usr on LVM for a |
| 5 |
>> good long while now. It has booted just fine. The new udev is what is |
| 6 |
>> going to break it, whether I use LVM or not from what has been said on |
| 7 |
>> this list and elsewhere. |
| 8 |
> I've been running separate /usr on LVM with ~arch udev and no initramfs |
| 9 |
> on a couple of systems with no problems. The news item is taking the easy |
| 10 |
> way out by saying "it will break" rather than "it may break" - such |
| 11 |
> breakage is by no means certain - although the future holds no |
| 12 |
> guarantees. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Then there is my luck. Right? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Dale |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
:-) :-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives