| 1 |
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 04:20 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 2 |
> But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses |
| 3 |
> with --package-names because of the lack of support for the |
| 4 |
> =category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still |
| 5 |
> supports.. :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Hey, I'm proud of that horrible hack! |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
However, on that note, I can't wait to get rid of it and use the |
| 10 |
=category/package-version:slot syntax. I've been strongly thinking of |
| 11 |
doing it in 0.2.4 which is in the pre-release cycle right now. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Regards, |
| 14 |
Paul |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives