Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia warning comes a tad late | ||
| Date: | Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:25:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 223D14EE-2526-4366-BB58-E3FB89025B3D@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] nvidia warning comes a tad late by "Michael P. Soulier" |
||
| 1 | On 31 Dec 2008, at 23:33, Michael P. Soulier wrote: |
| 2 | > ... |
| 3 | > Don't you think the default action here should be to do nothing |
| 4 | > instead of |
| 5 | > breaking my system? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | "That proposal is ludicrous and completely counter to the Unix |
| 9 | way of doing things." |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Not my opinion, just quoting. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia warning comes a tad late | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |