1 |
it didn't work :( although I didn't know about the existence of that file! |
2 |
:) |
3 |
|
4 |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> On 12/17/09, Crístian Viana <cristiandeives@×××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
> > hi, |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I run "glsa-check -f affected" to update a Gentoo system, but there's one |
10 |
> > specific package I can't update, because it's a C library someone is |
11 |
> using |
12 |
> > and the 'secure' version is causing segmentation fault on her program, so |
13 |
> I |
14 |
> > added it to packages.mask. but as I run glsa-check in a cron job, if |
15 |
> there's |
16 |
> > one package it can't emerge, it won't emerge the rest of them (if only I |
17 |
> > could add "--keep-going"). |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > does anyone have a solution to this? I want to keep running glsa-check to |
20 |
> > update my system, but I don't want to update one specific package. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > thanks! |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > -- |
25 |
> > Crístian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1] |
26 |
> > Sent from Campinas, SP, Brazil |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I don't know this for sure, but I wonder if putting the package in |
29 |
> package.provided would result in what you are looking for? So, unless |
30 |
> someone gets a better idea, I'd try to emerge the properly functioning |
31 |
> version of the package, and then mark it provided: |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=5#doc_chap3 |
35 |
> |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> Arttu V. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Crístian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1] |