1 |
You should never add that line in fstab in Gentoo. Don't follow random |
2 |
tutorials about random distro workarounds. Gentoo bootscripts mount usbfs on |
3 |
boot with gid=group=usb, so if you want to give user permissions for usbfs, |
4 |
you add yourself to the "usb" group, you don't need to do anything else, and |
5 |
Virtualbox will work (of course you also need to be in the vboxusers group). |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
Anyway, usbfs is not actually needed anymore, it has been replaced by usb |
9 |
/dev/ entries. VirtualBox will use usbfs if it is mounted, but if it is not, |
10 |
usb will work with the new improved way (better permission handling, for |
11 |
printers for example). I don't now of any application that works only with |
12 |
usbfs anymore, maybe it is time to remove it (or make it optional) from the |
13 |
default gentoo boot-scripts. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:28 PM, SpaceCake <spacecakex@×××××.com> wrote: |
18 |
|
19 |
> Hi, |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I have a problem with accessing usb devices from virtualbox after some |
22 |
> kernel/system update. Previously it was ok after I've added the following |
23 |
> line to the fstab |
24 |
> |
25 |
> usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs |
26 |
> devgid=1017,devmode=664 0 0 |
27 |
> |
28 |
> but now, there is no /proc/bus/usb |
29 |
> |
30 |
> how can I enable USB access for a regular user in this new situation? |
31 |
> Should I modify some kernel parameters? should I enable CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS |
32 |
> or there is some alternative solution? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Thanks |
35 |
> Laszlo |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |