| 1 |
On 04/09/17 23:58, Grant wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> I'm getting strange results from xdpyinfo. I always get 96x96 DPI and |
| 3 |
>>> the screen size changes along with the resolution. When I run 'xrandr |
| 4 |
>>> --dpi 200x200' and check xdpyinfo, it reports correctly. But if I log |
| 5 |
>>> out and back in to xfce4 without doing anything else, it gives me |
| 6 |
>>> 96x96 again. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> XFCE is probably forcing 96DPI by default. This is usually done by desktop |
| 10 |
>> environments that don't support DPI scaling very well. I just found this |
| 11 |
>> (sort of flame-war-ish) thread: |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=7734 |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> and indeed XFCE doesn't seem to have very good support for this. Maybe you |
| 16 |
>> can find some of the settings listed there useful though. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Other than that, if you want working DPI scaling, you'll have much better |
| 19 |
>> luck with KDE 5 / Plasma. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Won't I freak out if I'm an xfce4 guy and I try to switch to KDE? Is |
| 22 |
> there a better choice for HiDPI migration for people who like xfce4? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
You could try LXQt, which is the upcoming replacement for LXDE. It's |
| 25 |
Qt-based, so DPI scaling *should* work well (no guarantees, didn't try |
| 26 |
it myself yet.) And its desktop philosophy is more similar to XFCE, |
| 27 |
meaning minimalist, non-bloated UIs. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Anyway, if I were you, I'd just try all of them using live-CDs/USBs from |
| 30 |
various distros, and see what works best. LXDE, LXQt, Gnome, KDE, |
| 31 |
Budgie, those seem to be the main ones right now. |
Archives