Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug?
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:29:53
Message-Id: 9534095.Tor20cirUA@peak
1 Hello list,
2
3 While trying to get a USB printer recognised on an Atom box, I found this,
4 immediately after emerge --sync && eix-update:
5
6 (atom) peak / # eix -c kyocera
7 [N] net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver (--): Printer descriptions (PPDs) and filters for Kyocera 1x2x MFP
8 [N] net-print/kyocera-mita-ppds ((~)8.4-r1{tbz2}): PPD description files for (some) Kyocera Mita Printers
9 Found 2 matches
10
11 (atom) peak / # emerge -pv net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver net-print/kyocera-mita-ppds
12
13 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
14
15 Calculating dependencies ... done!
16
17 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver" have been masked.
18 !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
19 - net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver-1.1203-r1::gentoo (masked by: missing keyword)
20
21 (atom) peak / # grep kyocera /etc/portage/package.keywords
22 net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver
23 net-print/kyocera-mita-ppds
24
25 I wonder whether the "1x2x" is confusing portage.
26
27 --
28 Regards,
29 Peter.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a portage bug? Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@×××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: Is this a portage bug? nunojsilva@×××××××.pt