1 |
Bug 116811 :) |
2 |
[insecure] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116811 |
3 |
[secure] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116811 |
4 |
|
5 |
Getting fixed. |
6 |
|
7 |
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 21:41 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
8 |
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:36:44 +0100 Matthias Bethke |
9 |
> <matthias@×××××××.de> wrote: |
10 |
> | After finishing my latest sync, portage moaned about problems with my |
11 |
> | world file. emaint found out it was due to some package updates that |
12 |
> | deleted the versions I have installed and left only unstable ones. |
13 |
> | In particular, it was dev-tex/latex-beamer and its dependencies, pgf |
14 |
> | and xcolor. Nice to see somebody has gotten around to updating the |
15 |
> | ebuilds, but if there's a stable version, wouldn't it make sense to |
16 |
> | leave at least one around so people can decide if they want to use |
17 |
> | the unstable? net-im/skype has the same problem. It's asking for a |
18 |
> | new dbus which I'll just try out---hope it doesn't break too many |
19 |
> | things. I suppose they don't offer the old version for download any |
20 |
> | more and the new one doesn't work with the stable dbus? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Someone screwed up. Our x86 arch lead is going to hit them with a lead |
23 |
> pipe. You shouldn't encounter forced downgrades in stable unless |
24 |
> something really icky happens. You shouldn't encounter forced |
25 |
> downgrades in ~arch unless someone commits a version that works for |
26 |
> them and it later turns out that it's seriously broken (eg bash-3.1). |
27 |
> |
28 |
-- |
29 |
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@×××××.com> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org |
30 |
lares/irc.freenode.net | |
31 |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada |
32 |
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Preferred |
33 |
Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E |