1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:20 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Alex Schuster |
2 |
did opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Oh, even weirder: The phone just rang, and five minutes later, swap has |
5 |
> gone to 860M. I was running rdiff-backup --list-increment-sizes, maybe |
6 |
> this uses much memory, and caches the stuff. Now the command has finished, |
7 |
> and paging has stopped. The rdiff-backup process itself does not use much |
8 |
> memory. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> BTW, does anyone else's kwin use 750M? That's pretty high, I think it used |
11 |
> to be more like 300M. |
12 |
|
13 |
I've been noticing this kind of thing too for a while now. In my case it's the |
14 |
nepomuk/akonadi/virtuoso stack doing it - it seems to trigger full scans at |
15 |
weird times and does other special things after a resume from suspend. |
16 |
|
17 |
Virtuoso can sometimes get as high as 800M RES memory in top. Which is all |
18 |
quite bizarre, I suspect a dodgy config on my part. |
19 |
|
20 |
As for kwin - what column are you reading the value from? Here kwin uses more |
21 |
like 60M |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |