1 |
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 01:25:24 +0100 |
2 |
schrieb lee <lee@××××××××.de>: |
3 |
|
4 |
> "Poison BL." <poisonbl@×××××.com> writes: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:11 PM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> "Poison BL." <poisonbl@×××××.com> writes: |
9 |
> [...] |
10 |
> > trust |
11 |
> [...] |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> Why not? (12GB are nowhere close to half a petabyte ...) |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Ah... I completely misread that "or over 50k files in 12GB" as 50k |
16 |
> > files *at* 12GB each... which works out to 0.6 PB, incidentally. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> >> The data would come in from suppliers. There isn't really anything |
19 |
> >> going on atm but fetching data once a month which can be like |
20 |
> >> 100MB or 12GB or more. That's because ppl don't use ftp ... |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Really, if you're pulling it in from third party suppliers, you |
23 |
> > tend to be tied to what they offer as a method of pulling it from |
24 |
> > them (or them pushing it out to you), unless you're in the unique |
25 |
> > position to dictate the decision for them. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> They need to use ftp to deliver the data, we need to use ftp to get |
28 |
> the data. I don't want that any other way. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The problem is that the ones supposed to deliver data are incompetent |
31 |
> and don't want to use ftp because it's too complicated. So what's the |
32 |
> better solution? |
33 |
|
34 |
Use an edge router appliance with proper VPN support. You are from |
35 |
Germany? I can recommend Securepoint appliances. You pay for the |
36 |
hardware and support, they support you with setting everything up. You |
37 |
can also find a distributor who can install this for you. Securepoint |
38 |
works with competent partners all around Germany. |
39 |
|
40 |
There's also other alternatives like Watchguard (but their OpenVPN |
41 |
support is not that good), and a lot of free router/firewall softwares |
42 |
you can deploy to semi-professional equipment by firmware replacement. |
43 |
But at least with the latter option, you're mostly on your own and need |
44 |
to invest a lot of effort to make it work properly and secure. |
45 |
|
46 |
Depending on what data is transferred, you should also take into |
47 |
account if your solution is certificated to transfer such data. E.g. |
48 |
medical data may only be transferred through properly certificated VPN |
49 |
appliances. Otherwise, you should fall back to sneakernet. I'm not sure |
50 |
how that is any more secure but that's how things are. |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
Regards, |
55 |
Kai |
56 |
|
57 |
Replies to list-only preferred. |