| 1 |
firefox 64bit is unstable for me, and I also think I have a problem |
| 2 |
w/thunderbird / enigmail. Other than that I'm happily running 2 64bit |
| 3 |
machines |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 12/9/08, pat <pat@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 6 |
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:59:00 +0100, pat wrote |
| 7 |
>> Hello, |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I've bought a new laptop with Core 2 Duo processor which is 64 bit. |
| 10 |
>> My question is if applications (see below) compiled and running over |
| 11 |
>> 64 bits are stable enough or if I should compile for 32 bits. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> The applications are: |
| 14 |
>> - Seamoneky/Firefox |
| 15 |
>> - Java |
| 16 |
>> - Flash |
| 17 |
>> - Audacious |
| 18 |
>> - mplayer |
| 19 |
>> - VirtualBox/VMware |
| 20 |
>> - Qemu |
| 21 |
>> - Kerberos/OpenLDAP/OpenSSH (for these I think they are stable) |
| 22 |
>> - X.org/fluxbox |
| 23 |
>> - system suspending |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> I have 4GB RAM and I know better is to compile for 64 bits, but for |
| 26 |
>> me is more important stability. |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> Thanks a lot |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Pat |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Thanks for all advices. I'm going to try amd64 and I'll see :-D |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Thanks |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Pat |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
Archives