| 1 |
I noticed a lot of gpg signed mail on mailing lists fails signature |
| 2 |
verification lately, including this list. (Others: lkml, haskell-cafe, |
| 3 |
mutt-users, even oss-security.) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
It's not just me: quite a few others seem to have made the same |
| 6 |
observation. Please see the latest thread on mutt-users: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147417981514310&w=2 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Note that it is _not_ a mutt problem: one gets the same "BAD signature" |
| 11 |
result from a bare gpg run on the extracted message part. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So, what's going on? This would seem to be a Big Deal [TM]. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups |
| 17 |
Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? |
Archives