Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Apr 2015 09:51:07 |
| Message-Id: | 2929378.CsdgesgsUa@wstn |
| 1 | Hello list, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals. |
| 4 | Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a |
| 5 | list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just |
| 6 | exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of files that it can't |
| 7 | do anything with. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | What's going on here? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I've restored from last week's backup and added the offending perl packages |
| 12 | to package.mask, but is that the right thing to do? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Rgds |
| 16 | Peter. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? [SOLVED] | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |