Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:59:07
Message-Id: 20120328155636.5296a82d@hactar.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs? by Alan Mackenzie
1 On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:01:32 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
2
3 > > Read my other mail and pay attention to the difference between
4 > > transient and persistent.
5 >
6 > In my proposed solution, the executables in /sbin would only exist until
7 > /usr had been mounted and the runtime PATH set up. After the
8 > unification of /usr, /sbin won't even exist (apart from in schemes like
9 > mine).
10
11 What happens to files that are installed to /bin, /sbin or /lib by
12 default? Where do kernel modules go?
13
14 > I look forward with foreboding to the time when such recovery will not
15 > be possible. Only a legacy Gentoo system or a recovery CD will help
16 > then. I think it highly probable that "can't boot" bugs will continue
17 > to happen occasionally. I'd like to carry on having a bootable
18 > skeleton system for when this happens.
19
20 When an initramfs fails to boot, it drops you to a busybox shell,
21 although I also have a SystemRescueCD ISO in /boot for such situations.
22
23
24 --
25 Neil Bothwick
26
27 Top Oxymorons Number 12: Plastic glasses

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies