1 |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> Oh, and one other thing; hdparm is only meant to get you the continuous I/O |
3 |
> transfer rate. It's an awful benchmark for anything else, like what happens |
4 |
> if a file is fragmented or how fast it can copy/write data spread around the |
5 |
> disk, how good it is at combined random I/O operation, etc. |
6 |
|
7 |
For that kind of information, go with bonnie++ |
8 |
|
9 |
I've little else to add to the thread, except that I ran three Seagate |
10 |
1.5TB 'green' drives in RAID5 for quite a while with very nice |
11 |
perforance results. Access times were comfy, and I tended to get about |
12 |
60MB/s continuous read and write speed. I hadn't learned about |
13 |
bonnie++ yet, so I don't have any good benchmarks to show on that |
14 |
front. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
:wq |