Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:12:04
Message-Id: ae107db90812011211s5ba588fer9f0c09e29d83b585@mail.gmail.com
1 On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:27:22 +0200
2 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 [-snip-]
5
6 >
7 > You are the one making them claims! You do the test!
8
9
10 Me? No, my dear. It is you who claims that fragmentation only matters
11 on MS file systems while Linux FS remain unaffected w/o providing
12 any proof. The common sense says otherwise: fragmentation leads to
13 seeks, seeks hurt performance.
14
15 Anyways, I'm going to do the tests because I want to see the numbers.
16 Should the outcome prove you were right I'd be the first to
17 congratulate and thank you for opening my eyes.
18
19 Since I'm going to use my workstation at work to do the job at night
20 I'll limit the repetitions to 400 which would take about 13 hours with
21 two files, 2GB each. The machine has 1GB RAM installed and I'll run the
22 test in Gentoo's "boot" rc level. I've closed everything except sshd
23 and screen (see "ps" outpput below) and have taken care of the cache
24 by clearing it before each run via /proc (see the script). The file
25 system is ext3 and during the test it will be used in about 30% of its
26 capacity:
27
28 localhost test # df -h | grep home
29 /dev/sdc1 15G 718M 14G 5% /home
30
31 localhost test # mount -v | grep home
32 /dev/sdc1 on /home/ type ext3
33 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,data=journal,commit=1)
34
35
36 localhost test # rc-status
37 Runlevel: boot
38 bootmisc [ started ]
39 checkfs [ started ]
40 checkroot [ started ]
41 clock [ started ]
42 hostname [ started ]
43 iptables [ started ]
44 localmount [ started ]
45 modules [ started ]
46 net.eth0 [ started ]
47 net.lo [ started ]
48 sshd [ started ]
49 udev-postmount [ started ]
50
51
52 localhost test # ps af
53 PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
54 12191 pts/0 Ss 0:00 -bash
55 12227 pts/0 S 0:00 \_ su -
56 12231 pts/0 S 0:00 \_ -su
57 12266 pts/0 S+ 0:00 \_ screen -x
58 8575 pts/3 Ss+ 0:00 -/bin/bash
59 4967 pts/2 Ss 0:00 -/bin/bash
60 12830 pts/2 R+ 0:00 \_ ps af
61 4895 pts/1 Ss+ 0:03 -/bin/bash
62 4755 tty6 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty6 linux
63 4754 tty5 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty5 linux
64 4753 tty4 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty4 linux
65 4752 tty3 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty3 linux
66 4751 tty2 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty2 linux
67 4750 tty1 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty1 linux
68
69
70 The script:
71
72 #!/bin/bash
73
74 cat /usr/portage/distfiles/* > test1
75 cp test1 test2
76
77 filefrag test*
78
79 sync
80
81 for (( i=0 ; i<=400 ; i++ ))
82 do
83
84 sync
85 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
86
87 echo -n "try_no=$i "
88
89 /usr/bin/time -f "\
90 command=%C|\
91 real_t=%e|\
92 kernel_t=%S|\
93 user_t=%U|\
94 major_faults=%F|\
95 minor_faults=%R|\
96 context_sw=%c|\
97 io_waits=%w|\
98 fs_reads=%I|\
99 fs_writes=%O" cp test1 /dev/null
100
101 sync
102 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
103
104 echo -n "try_no=$i "
105
106 /usr/bin/time -f "\
107 command=%C|\
108 real_t=%e|\
109 kernel_t=%S|\
110 user_t=%U|\
111 major_faults=%F|\
112 minor_faults=%R|\
113 context_sw=%c|\
114 io_waits=%w|\
115 fs_reads=%I|\
116 fs_writes=%O" cp test2 /dev/null
117
118
119 done
120
121 ###########EOF
122
123
124
125 I hope all this will be enough for you to accept the results.
126
127
128
129 --
130 Best regards,
131 Daniel

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] [Even More OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly Anthony Metcalf <nevyn@××××××××××.uk>