Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Portage vs Qt
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 05:06:12
Message-Id: 20161214050600.GC1795@ca.inter.net
1 I just updated Qt5 to 5.6.2 & ran into a familiar Portage problem.
2
3 The emerge command responds with a list of "conflicts",
4 all involving 5.6.1 vs 5.6.2 versions of the c 15 pkgs.
5 The only way to get around this is to unmerge the existing pkgs via '-C',
6 then install the new versions. That works, but it's brute force.
7
8 Portage sb able to resolve this kind of conflict for itself.
9 If not, then at least it should advise users intelligently
10 to do what I've just described. It can happen with other sets of pkgs.
11
12 Yes, I did do 'backtrack==30'.
13
14 Before I send in a bug, does anyone else have useful comments ?
15
16 --
17 ========================,,============================================
18 SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
19 ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
20 TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage vs Qt John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage vs Qt "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
[gentoo-user] Re: Portage vs Qt Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com>