1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Thursday 26 May 2011 00:40:21 Alex Schuster wrote: |
4 |
> > Paul Hartman writes: |
5 |
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |
6 |
> > > wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> > Maybe I should have bought 4G instead of 2G, so I'd have 10G, not 8G. |
9 |
> > I'm not sure if this is recommended these days, to have one memory bank |
10 |
> > with 4G and 3 others with 2G each. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It is very much not recommended nor wise. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Sometimes it works great, sometimes it just works, sometimes it burns |
15 |
> down your village, rapes your cattle and steals your dad. |
16 |
|
17 |
Ookay. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
> > It's growing: 1405m VIRT, 851m RES, 6m SHR. Strange, I did not actually |
21 |
> > use the desktop after I wrote the mail you replied to, currently I'm |
22 |
> > logged in from remote. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> and you know that those numbers are pretty much meaningless? |
25 |
|
26 |
Are they? Well, apparently _something_ in kwin was using hundreds of |
27 |
megabytes. When I was back at the PC, I had to wait three minutes until he |
28 |
password dialog appeared so I could unlock the session. iotop showed the |
29 |
kwin process swapping, and no other activity. |
30 |
Now kwin is at 37M, which is much lower than I thought... whoops, I made a |
31 |
mistake in my previous posting, I got the virtual memory column instead by |
32 |
misusing awk. I also confused kwin with plasma-desktop, which had been |
33 |
really high in the past. |
34 |
|
35 |
> about swap: |
36 |
> |
37 |
> 8gb ram, 24gb swap here. Swap so huge because of historical reasons |
38 |
> (started with one disk with 8gb, now there are three...). But not so |
39 |
> bad, considering all those tempfs mounts that can shoved in there. |
40 |
|
41 |
Yikes. I'd rather use the space for other stuff... no matter how large hard |
42 |
drives are, mine tend to fill up so I am glad for every extra gigabyte I can |
43 |
find. |
44 |
|
45 |
> Of course I am scared about the shitstorm if that ever happens. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> I am using the standard scheduler, no fancy io-scheduling stuff, kernel |
48 |
> 2.6.36.6 and can't complain. |
49 |
|
50 |
I do, a lot. But it seems that the system performs okay now. |
51 |
|
52 |
> Even after a week of uptime I only get 500mb swap. Some cruft still in |
53 |
> memory for some i-dont-know-reasons shoved in the hellhole swap so it |
54 |
> won't get in the way of the more important stuff. Like gwenview. Or vlc. |
55 |
|
56 |
Yeah, that's how it should be. A little swap is okay. But in my case it felt |
57 |
like important stuff was swapped out. |
58 |
|
59 |
Wonko |