| 1 |
On Monday 30 October 2006 11:01, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Looks like the tree was busy over the weekend :-). My regular sync and |
| 5 |
> emerge world this morning results in just about every x11 package |
| 6 |
> wanting to be rebuilt. Lots of stuff like this: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-libs/xtrans-1.0.2 USE="X%* -debug" 0 kB |
| 9 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-apps/mkfontdir-1.0.2 USE="X%* -debug" 0 kB |
| 10 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-apps/mkfontscale-1.0.2 USE="X%* -debug" 0 kB |
| 11 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-libs/libfontenc-1.0.3 USE="X%* -debug" 0 kB |
| 12 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-proto/xproto-7.0.8 USE="X%* -debug" 0 kB |
| 13 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-misc/util-macros-1.1.1 USE="X%* -debug" 0 kB |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What's up with this? I've always had X in my USE, the ebuilds haven't |
| 16 |
> changed, a few that I checked inherit only x-modular which doesn't seem |
| 17 |
> to affect it either. And I'm not relishing the many hours of compiling |
| 18 |
> this is going to entail. So two questions: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> 1. What's causing these packages to have an X use flag at all? |
| 21 |
> 2. Why use such a flag at all? These are X11 packages, seems kinda |
| 22 |
> pointless to compile such a thing without X11 support... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The x-modular.eclass now inherits the font.eclass ... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/x-modular.eclass?r1=1.77&r2=1.78 |
| 27 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/font.eclass?rev=1.21&view=markup |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives