1 |
Am Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:12:26 -0700 |
2 |
schrieb kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net>: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I've noticed this a couple of times this week. A few of you have |
5 |
> responded to the annoying Fortran thread, changed the subject, started a |
6 |
> new message, and sent the email starting a new thread. |
7 |
|
8 |
I have not noticed this. Scanning through the thread, I do not see any subject |
9 |
changes. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Because you responded to an existing thread you are not creating a new |
12 |
> thread and thus and reducing the size of the audience that reads your |
13 |
> email. Specially I'd have responded to "open source monitoring on |
14 |
> gentoo", but since I deleted the Fortran thread in its boring entirety I |
15 |
> didn't even see it until I saw a response further down the chain today. |
16 |
> Whoever started Fbsplash did the same thing. |
17 |
|
18 |
For me, both of the threads you mention appear as their own threads (using |
19 |
claws-mail). So I checked the email sources and could not find any "References" |
20 |
headers in either of the thread parents. So, perhaps this is a bug in |
21 |
Thunderbird? |
22 |
|
23 |
> kashani |
24 |
|
25 |
HTH |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Marc Joliet |
28 |
-- |
29 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
30 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |