1 |
On 24/02/2013 23:16, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 24 Feb 2013 19:32:22 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
>> On 24/02/2013 19:53, Mick wrote: |
4 |
>>> I'm trying to run revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libmpc.so.2' && |
5 |
>>> rm '/usr/lib/libmpc.so.2' following the elog message after I updated |
6 |
>>> dev-libs/mpc-1.0.1. (I think). |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>> Anyway, one (rather ancient) box continuous to fail with: |
9 |
>> [...] |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>>> `/mnt/video/tmp_portage/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3/work/build' |
12 |
>>> Comparing stages 2 and 3 |
13 |
>>> warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs |
14 |
>>> warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs |
15 |
>>> Bootstrap comparison failure! |
16 |
>>> gcc/varasm.o differs |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411333 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Thanks Alan. I failed to find it when I looked, which can only mean one thing |
21 |
> ... that I'm going blind! LOL! |
22 |
|
23 |
:-) |
24 |
|
25 |
I know the feeling ... |
26 |
|
27 |
> The strange thing is that I didn't have a problem emerging it last time. |
28 |
> Anyhow, I've just changed the CFLAG -march=pentium3 and emerging it again with |
29 |
> -march=i686. |
30 |
|
31 |
Searching bgo for "gcc" is just painful, so I added the error you posted |
32 |
to the search string: |
33 |
|
34 |
gcc Bootstrap comparison failure! |
35 |
|
36 |
Often times the searchstring makes all the difference and searchstrings |
37 |
are an advanced technology therefore indistinguishable from magic. If |
38 |
they were easy and not magic-like, they would be insufficiently advanced |
39 |
for our needs (with apologies to a certain mr Clarke) |
40 |
|
41 |
:-) |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Alan McKinnon |
48 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |