Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Is emacs-vcs bug 299997 back? [repo rename]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:06:13
Message-Id: 87y65rfv0k.fsf@newsguy.com
1 [aside: It may be of note that this `emerge world' comes after about
2 2-3 mnths of neglect]
3
4 I've hit something during an emege world while emerging emacs-vcs,
5 that looks a lot like bug #299667:
6
7 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299667
8
9 I found the bug by googling the last bits from the build.log
10 `bzr.eclass: can't update from
11 bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/'
12
13 But the bug is reported fixed. This was sometime like Jan 2010.
14
15 Reading the story of the bug I see its been due to renaming of stuff
16 upstream.
17
18 And a thead in emacs.devel list is cited:
19
20 <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/119347/focus=119402>
21
22 Again its quite old now so I wonder if there has been a recurrence of
23 changes upstream or something else?
24
25 Before posting a bug, I thought I'd ask here and see if it really is a
26 bug or if others recently emerging emacs-vcs have had no trouble