| 1 |
Starting yesterday IIRC I've been getting one of the messages below |
| 2 |
every time my Fetchmail cron job polls my 2 ISPs for new mail. |
| 3 |
The content of the msg clearly comes from my own Fetchmail, |
| 4 |
as it refers to both ISPs, but the msg itself originates at Uniserve, |
| 5 |
as is shown by the list of routings in the full header (not shown). |
| 6 |
Perhaps Uniserve has changed its procedures with this result, |
| 7 |
but before I phone their tech folks, I'ld like to be sure |
| 8 |
that it's not caused by something in my own machine. |
| 9 |
I'm not aware of having changed anything to do with mail recently. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Does anyone have any suggestions based on experience ? |
| 12 |
Is there any way to tell Procmail to dump the msgs in /dev/null ? |
| 13 |
I have read the various man pages several times & checked Gentoo Forum, |
| 14 |
but there's no sign of anything relevant. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- start of message -- |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 |
| 19 |
Envelope-to: purslow@××××××××.net |
| 20 |
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:30:08 -0800 |
| 21 |
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:30:03 -0500 |
| 22 |
From: Cron Daemon <root@×××××××××××××××××××××.ca> |
| 23 |
To: purslow@×××××××××××××××××××××.ca |
| 24 |
Subject: Cron <purslow@localhost> /usr/bin/fetchmail |
| 25 |
X-Cron-Env: <SHELL=/bin/sh> |
| 26 |
X-Cron-Env: <HOME=/home/purslow> |
| 27 |
X-Cron-Env: <PATH=/usr/bin:/bin> |
| 28 |
X-Cron-Env: <LOGNAME=purslow> |
| 29 |
X-Cron-Env: <USER=purslow> |
| 30 |
X-Scanner: OK. Scanned. |
| 31 |
X-Uniserve-Spam-Score: 2.2 22 (++) |
| 32 |
X-Uniserve-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.2 points) |
| 33 |
pts rule name description |
| 34 |
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- |
| 35 |
0.9 TO_MALFORMED To: has a malformed address |
| 36 |
1.3 ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT To: address appears in Subject |
| 37 |
X-Scanner: OK. Scanned. |
| 38 |
X-Uniserve-Spam-Score: 2.2 22 (++) |
| 39 |
X-Uniserve-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on this mail system has |
| 40 |
identified this incoming email as possible spam. An |
| 41 |
analysis of the message is below. |
| 42 |
Content analysis details: (2.2 points) |
| 43 |
pts rule name description |
| 44 |
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- |
| 45 |
0.9 TO_MALFORMED To: has a malformed address |
| 46 |
1.3 ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT To: address appears in Subject |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
3 messages (3 seen) for purslow at pop.chass.utoronto.ca (22378 octets). |
| 49 |
skipping message purslow@××××××××××××××××××××××.ca:1 not flushed |
| 50 |
skipping message purslow@××××××××××××××××××××××.ca:2 not flushed |
| 51 |
skipping message purslow@××××××××××××××××××××××.ca:3 not flushed |
| 52 |
1 message for purslow at pop.ca.inter.net (2763 octets). |
| 53 |
reading message purslow@×××××××××××××××××××××.ca:1 of 1 (2763 octets).. flushed |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-- end of message -- |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
========================,,============================================ |
| 59 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
| 60 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
| 61 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |
Archives