Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: CORRECTION - Problem with eix-REMOTE update... WAS: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with eix-update
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:58:43
Message-Id: 4F8C6AF1.6080402@libertytrek.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Problem with eix-update by Tanstaafl
1 On 2012-04-16 2:38 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > I haven't searched layman for packages in a long time (actually had to
5 > google how to do it), and am getting an error I can't seem to solve...
6 >
7 > problems arised with cachefile _var_lib_layman_zugaina.eix
8 > * Calling eix-update...
9 > * could not read all eix cachefiles of
10 > /tmp/eix-remote.dhR5mKNK/eix-caches.tbz2
11 >
12 > Then finally:
13 >
14 > Database contains 16219 packages in 155 categories.
15 > * could not read all eix cachefiles of
16 > /tmp/eix-remote.w473Rccs/eix-caches.tbz2
17 >
18 > Probably your eix cachefile was *not* updated successfully.
19 > Unless the above messages suggest another cause or you specified a
20 > wrong filename, the most likely cause of this is that the server uses
21 > another eix version than you or produced broken data. Please inspect
22 > /tmp/eix-remote.w473Rccs/eix-caches.tbz2
23 > whether this is a valid *.tar.bz2 archive containing eix cachefiles
24 > (if it has already been deleted, download it using fetch).
25 > If this is not the case (but was freshly downloaded), please report a bug.
26 > Note that the archive is *not* broken if only the cachefile format
27 > versions differ: In that case only report a bug if the eix cachefile
28 > format versions in the downloaded file are *older* than that of the most
29 > current ~x86 eix version in the portage tree (but first retry after
30 > several days before reporting such a bug to give the server maintainers
31 > a chance to upgrade after a version bump of eix).
32 > Conversely, if the downloaded versions are even newer than that
33 > supported by your eix, you will have to upgrade to the most current ~x86
34 > version of eix to use eix-remote: This inconvenience cannot be avoided
35 > and is not a bug!
36 >
37 > Not sure what to do here or how things got hosed...
38 >