1 |
Again top-posting :) |
2 |
One thing for you before I leave: |
3 |
I know that it is possible to avoid installation of unwanted upgrades |
4 |
using portage, but I don't like to have to say my comp what NOT TO DO. I |
5 |
await from my comp to do what I say it TO DO because I'm (mostly) |
6 |
knowing what I'm doing. |
7 |
|
8 |
F. |
9 |
|
10 |
PS: Imagine you send your wife buying some food. What is more |
11 |
applicable? Telling her what to buy or telling her what not to buy? |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 20:04 +0200, sdoma wrote: |
15 |
> I've tried to get documentoin for Tcl/tk, put 'doc' into the package.use |
16 |
> for these files and re-emerged tcl and tk (BTW: no docs for these |
17 |
> packages came up). emerge told me, that there is a new version of |
18 |
> portage available and that it is HIGHLY recommended to upgrade portage. |
19 |
> I did so and 87 packages where upgraded, amongst this glibc to 2.4, what |
20 |
> hurts me now because I planned to install Oracle, which requires |
21 |
> glibc2.3. |
22 |
> Seems x86 or ~x86 doesn't make much a difference. I reinstalled the |
23 |
> system not so long ago with x86 fo this reason. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I remember the same problems a couple of times in the past. /etc/fstab |
26 |
> was "upgraded" to the initial one (the one with /dev/BOOT and dev/ROOT |
27 |
> inside resulting in a not booting system), networking stopped working |
28 |
> letting me on my own, stopping hotplug (and historical |
29 |
> coldplug-nonsense) functionality, udev.rules where replaced by some |
30 |
> initial one for a syntax change in udev (using ``sed'' would be a better |
31 |
> choice here) ... |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Just a minor thing, before I realized the USB problem, I was working on |
34 |
> 'localhost:unknown-domain' after the "upgrade". |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I'm really sick of solving the same problems again and again. Seems |
37 |
> Gentoo is a system for students not needing their comps to be working. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> For me it looks at this point like: "Every other distribution is a |
40 |
> better choice for somebody who needs his machine for work". I don't like |
41 |
> to say that, but this is my expirience. :(((((((((((((( |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Regards |
44 |
> Frank |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> PS: X-cuse me top-posting. This is a really exportant issue, and I'm |
48 |
> disturbing it. ;-( |
49 |
> |
50 |
> PS 2: Co work with LFS! They have the same target (get people to know |
51 |
> the functionality of Linux). I'll install some working distro which is |
52 |
> conform with other POSIX compliant systems ... with a tear in my |
53 |
> eye. :(((((((((((( |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 18:31 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
57 |
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:48:20 +0200, sdoma wrote: |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> > > I'm running 2.6.17.6. |
60 |
> > > It worked before the upgrade |
61 |
> > |
62 |
> > Which upgrade? emerge -u world could update one package or a hundred. |
63 |
> > Which packages were upgraded? |
64 |
> > |
65 |
> > Please don't top-post. |
66 |
> > |
67 |
> > |
68 |
> |
69 |
|
70 |
-- |
71 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |