| 1 |
On Saturday 22 Mar 2014 00:28:04 Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Judging by replies so far, I'd guess not many at all. You can't |
| 4 |
> > possibly know how many will or will not plonk someone. In the meantime |
| 5 |
> > Dale, I think you are projecting. Chill out brother, chill out. Plenty |
| 6 |
> > stuff in the world more deserving of attention than this. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I fixed it now. No more problems. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Dale |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> :-) :-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Some of us read all, but reply only where we think we can add value and when |
| 15 |
time allows. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
There is no need really on this list for verbal abuse, especially when a |
| 18 |
contributor has offered well considered advice and carefully articulated |
| 19 |
opinion. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Nevertheless, I also find personally addressed emails annoying, but it can be |
| 22 |
fixed by setting up a filter on most mail clients to drop them in the |
| 23 |
corresponding M/L. This may be a more civil way than alienating people who |
| 24 |
want to join this community. I'm just saying ... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Mick |
Archives