| 1 |
I just noticed that ReiserFS has significant performance over ext3, 4 when |
| 2 |
dealing with small files. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 5 Oct 2017 11:32 pm, "christos kotsis" <christo.kotsi@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
If the big data are used often,and I/O performance is desirable, then I |
| 7 |
would go for two partitions. |
| 8 |
One would be either ext3 or ext4, with huge block size, while the second |
| 9 |
could be one of two with small block size(minimum 1024). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On 5 Oct 2017 10:46 pm, <pat@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hi, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Installing gentoo on new laptop and it has 2TB disk. I want to use 1.8TB |
| 17 |
for data where will be big files and also huge amount of small files, thus |
| 18 |
I want to ask which FS is best for this. Until now I've used reiserfs on |
| 19 |
cca 0.5TB partition, but I don't know if it's also good choice for that big |
| 20 |
partition. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I've thought about zfs, but I don't need snapshots and such stuff mostly |
| 23 |
scaling is requirement. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Pat |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
---------------------------------------- |
| 30 |
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/ |
Archives