Archives
Archives
| From: | lego12239@××××××.ru | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:30:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20200422163137.GB4639@legohost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by Michael Orlitzky |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:16:20PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 | > On 4/22/20 12:14 PM, lego12239@××××××.ru wrote: |
| 3 | > > Yes. And yes again :-). +1 |
| 4 | > > portage must be in C and statically linked. |
| 5 | > > python is a strange dependency. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Paludis was a C++ package manager, but is dead now. No one's willing to |
| 8 | > work on these things when ::gentoo is portage-only. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | No-no. C++ is a nightmare. A few people want to use it. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Michael Jones <gentoo@×××××××.com> |