| 1 |
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:53 PM, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I have two machines with 4GB of ram and I've never seen either one use |
| 3 |
> swapspace (yet) so I'm thinking I could delete my swap partitions and |
| 4 |
> substitute a much smaller swapfile -- if it's safe. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Any downside to using a swap file instead of a swap partition, maybe |
| 7 |
> depending on which filesystem you use, or something? Security holes? |
| 8 |
> Any horror stories out there? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think a swapfile cannot be used for suspend-to-disk. When creating a |
| 11 |
swap file you should take care to ensure it is not fragmented. |
| 12 |
Otherwise, performance should be equal between swap partition or swap |
| 13 |
file under normal circumstances, as far as I know. |
Archives