| 1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
| 2 |
> From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:iaindb@××××××××××××.au] |
| 3 |
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM |
| 4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 5 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else, |
| 8 |
> but what I _don't_ like is when you have both man and info, |
| 9 |
> and one of them is very deficient (in grub's case, man). The |
| 10 |
> description is different, less informative, and quite |
| 11 |
> misleading. Instead, is should say either nothing but "refer |
| 12 |
> to info pages"; or it should be the same as the info pages... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> would anyone agree? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That is exactly what a number of packages do I think.
|
| 17 |
I have seen many of them that the man page and the
|
| 18 |
info page were identicle. More often though it looked
|
| 19 |
like they made a decent man page, and coppied it to info.
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
:-)
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
éí¢‹¬z¸ žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |
Archives