1 |
> Hi, |
2 |
> |
3 |
> add to your /etc/portage/package.license : |
4 |
> |
5 |
> net-im/skype skype-eula |
6 |
> |
7 |
> This will unmask skype. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> regards, |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Boris |
12 |
|
13 |
Could someone explain the purpose of this new portage feature? I was |
14 |
hoping adding a license to package.license would negate the need to |
15 |
agree to the license when emerging, but it doesn't seem to do that. |
16 |
|
17 |
- Grant |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
>> This is confusing me ... |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> I have skype-2.0.0.72 installed for some time now. eix -l skype shows: |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> [I] net-im/skype |
25 |
>> Available versions: |
26 |
>> 2.0.0.72!m!s "amd64 x86" [qt-static] |
27 |
>> ~ 2.1.0.81+i!m!s "~amd64 ~x86" [qt-static] |
28 |
>> Installed versions: 2.0.0.72!m!s(06:22:21 04/15/09)(-qt-static) |
29 |
>> Homepage: http://www.skype.com/ |
30 |
>> Description: A P2P-VoiceIP client. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> However, after updating portage I see: |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> Calculating dependencies... done! |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> !!! The following installed packages are masked: |
39 |
>> - net-im/skype-2.0.0.72 (masked by: skype-eula license(s)) |
40 |
>> A copy of the 'skype-eula' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/skype- |
41 |
>> eula'. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> Is portage telling me that I need to do something about the eula? eix does |
44 |
>> not show this version as being masked. |
45 |
>> -- |
46 |
>> Regards, |
47 |
>> Mick |