1 |
On 4/2/20 6:26 PM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote: |
2 |
> though i'm a bit curious about sendmail (if your time allows). |
3 |
|
4 |
Feel free to ask questions about sendmail. I'll do my best to answer. |
5 |
|
6 |
> do you mean the ebuild "sendmail"? or the command "sendmail"? |
7 |
|
8 |
In this context, ebuild as a reference to the MTA known as Sendmail. |
9 |
|
10 |
> i used to think it's a swiss-army kind of tool (used to call |
11 |
> "sendmail" in my cgi scripts decades ago without any infrastructure; |
12 |
> by just directly zapping recipient's smtp gateway). |
13 |
|
14 |
Yes, Sendmail can e a Swiss Army knife. That's one of it's advantages. |
15 |
That's also one of it's disadvantages. |
16 |
|
17 |
Your historic use of Sendmail is an example of using a local queuing |
18 |
MTA. Your CGI scripts passed the message off to the queuing MTA and |
19 |
didn't need to worry about what to do if the remote mail server couldn't |
20 |
be reached. You didn't have to bother with detecting the error and |
21 |
reporting it to the end user via the web form. You didn't have to |
22 |
bother with storing information for later retry. The local queuing MTA |
23 |
did all of that for you. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Grant. . . . |
29 |
unix || die |