Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Notice: possible past, present and future breakage related to .la files
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:52:01
Message-Id: 1286020299.8777.0.camel@rattus
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Notice: possible past, present and future breakage related to .la files by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 00:40 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > Hi all users,
3 >
4 > Secondly, you can avoid any future requirement for this by sanitising
5 > the newly installed .la files; this can be done either by using the
6 > (currently testing) Portage 2.1.9 series, or by adding the following
7 > snippet to your /etc/portage/bashrc:
8 >
9 > post_src_install() {
10 > lafilefixer "${D}"
11 > }
12 >
13
14
15 A question I cant see answered anywhere though its been asked:
16
17 What are the implications of adding this "snippet" - will it come back
18 to bite us (users) when the next version of portage comes along?
19
20
21 and in addition:
22 - none of my systems have a /etc/portage/bashrc so Ive created them, but
23 should they be executable, have a hash-bang line, ... ?
24
25 - will this snippet fix the problems with "equery check" marking
26 libraries as broken after lafilefixer is run? (I presume an emerge -e
27 world will be needed to update the database ...)
28
29 BillK

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Notice: possible past, present and future breakage related to .la files "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>