| 1 |
On Monday 06 December 2004 12:38, cdemarco@××××××××.fm wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:58:00AM +0100, Luigi Pinna wrote: |
| 3 |
> > unmerging sysvinit the block is not more here! |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Except that sysvinit contains init(3), which is required for boot. |
| 6 |
> Make sure you've got it with `which init' ... if not, you've got to |
| 7 |
> emerge sysvinit or else your box won't boot! |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Half wrong. sysvinit and <baselayout-1.11 both contain init(3). sysvinit |
| 10 |
should not be used unless baselayout is upgraded to the testing version as |
| 11 |
well. If init(3) is missing (which it shouldn't be if my instructions were |
| 12 |
followed correctly) the solution is to reemerge baselayout. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Regards, |
| 15 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives