1 |
+1 for deluge, being for server (with web interface, the ajax interface is |
2 |
great) or just for desktop. The pre-made gentoo daemon for deluge is also |
3 |
very well made so you will have less job to do to get it working. |
4 |
|
5 |
I first tried rtorrent but I think this software has many bugs. Even though |
6 |
I adjusted the global_max_downloads, rtorrent kept downloading unlimited |
7 |
torrents simultaneously which is unacceptable. also rtorrent for a strange |
8 |
reason stops downloading/uploading after some weeks in my case, this has |
9 |
never happened with deluge to me, and the same session is running for 1 |
10 |
month now non-stop. |
11 |
|
12 |
Also I think rtorrent needs a better ncurses interface. It is a pain |
13 |
changing config parameters live, and generally working on it without |
14 |
plugging in a web interface. Even console versions of transmission and |
15 |
deluge are better than rtorrent. |
16 |
|
17 |
In the old times that I used Azureus it was rock stable, I am happy to see |
18 |
someone still using it. I want to try the new vuze some time. |
19 |
|
20 |
When transmission adds option for max simultaneous downloads/uploads , it |
21 |
will be worth checking out as well, right now it is so incomplete. |
22 |
|
23 |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:02 AM, laurent <laurent@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
24 |
|
25 |
> Hi, |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I would like to use my server as bittorent client and maybe tracker later. |
28 |
> I would like to have a web interface but I could also develop it myself |
29 |
> later. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I saw, qbittorent and hrktorrent that looks good. I don't know any features |
32 |
> of the last one. |
33 |
> What would you recommend to use? |
34 |
> |
35 |
> thanks |
36 |
> Laurent |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |