| 1 |
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 11:07 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:25:29 -0700, David Grant wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > > Because the startup scripts are no longer running sequentially, the OK |
| 5 |
> > > responses make little sense, as they won't necessarily appear i the |
| 6 |
> > > same order and the scripts are run. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Um, but the OK could appear after a script finishes succesfully. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Script A starts |
| 11 |
> Script B starts |
| 12 |
> Script B succeeds |
| 13 |
> Script A succeeds |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> How do you know which OK applies to which script? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think the OP is suggesting this: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Script A starts print nothing |
| 20 |
Script B starts print nothing |
| 21 |
Script B succeeds print "script B [ok]" |
| 22 |
Script A succeeds print "script A [ok]" |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Yes, we have consensus that we need 64 bit support. :-) |
| 28 |
-- Larry Wall in <199710291922.LAA07101@××××.org> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives