1 |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:20:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Compare how Google goes about doing things with how Adobe does it. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> The Google Chromium team appears to take security seriously and are open and |
6 |
> up-front about what they do. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Adobe likes to stonewall on issues and create an aura of how sekrit stuff is. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Which one inspires confidence in fellow geeks? |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
Neither. Adobe is utterly incompetent and apathetic, google is evil |
14 |
and wants to sell ad space for h3rb41 v14gr4 in your brain. |
15 |
|
16 |
Flash is a necessary evil for a lot of us, chrome(ium) is not. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
caveat utilitor |
20 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ |