Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo | ||
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2011 06:01:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | EC76EC58-E2C0-4226-A39B-E1C524034DED@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo by Kevin O'Gorman |
||
| 1 | On 27/5/2011, at 12:28am, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 2 | > ... |
| 3 | > * Two XEON chips. I didn't know it right away but that means 4 cores. They are old Pentium IV-based 32-bit chips. I got the slowest still being made, so the clock speed is 1.6 GHz. On 4 cores, it's not bad at all. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I *think* at that age those may be single-core hyperthreading chips, which would nevertheless show in (for instance) `top` as 4 cores. I won't swear to this, though. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo | Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com> |